A PLC is not the only choice for controlling a process. Sticking with only basic relays may be of a benefit depending upon your application. Yet, on the other hand, a computer might be the way to go. The PLC vs. PC debate has been going on for a long time. More often though it doesn't come down to an "either or" situation but involves a mix of technologies.
When I first started programming PLCs it was still questionable if a PLC was necessary over just relay control. With PLC prices going down, size shrinking, and performance of PLCs improving over the years this has become less of a battle. Yet the designer has to ask themselves if a PLC is really overkill for their application. Some questions should be asked.

A dedicated controller is a single instrument that is dedicated to controlling one parameter such as a PID controller measuring a temperature for heating control. They have the advantages of an all in one package, typically with display and buttons. This can be a very good thing to use in simple applications. A PLC these days can compete price wise and functionally with these controllers especially if you more then one controller is needed. PLCs offer a greater degree of flexibility too because the can be programmed to handle all sorts of different scenarios.

The PLC vs. PC debate has been going on for years and I'm not going to attempt to give the definitive answer. They both have their pros and cons. What often happens is that the two are used for their strengths in different parts of the factory.
| Â | PLC | PC |
| Environment | The PLC was specifically designed for harsh conditions with electrical noise, magnetic fields, vibration, extreme temperatures or humidity. | Common PCs are not designed for harsh environments. Industrial PCs are available but cost more. |
| Ease of Use | By design PLCs are friendlier to technicians since they are in ladder logic and have easy connections. | Operating systems like Windows are common. Connecting I/O to the PC is not always as easy. |
| Flexibility | PLCs in rack form are easy to exchange and add parts. They are designed for modularity and expansion. | Typical PCs are limited by the number of cards they can accommodate and are not easily expandable. |
| Speed | PLCs execute a single program in sequential order. The have better ability to handle events in real time. | PCs, by design, are meant to handle simultaneous tasks. They have difficulty handling real time events. |
| Reliability | A PLC never crashes over long periods of time. ("Never" may not be the right word but its close enough to be true.) | A PC locking up and crashing is frequent. |
| Programming languages | Languages are typically fixed to ladder logic, function block or structured text. | A PC is very flexible and powerful in what to use for programming. |
| Data management | Memory is limited in its ability to store a lot of data. | This is where the PC excels because of it's hard drive. Any long term data storage, history and trending is best done on a PC. |
| Cost | Just too hard to compare pricing with so many variables like I/O counts, hardware needed, programming software, etc. | |
Hybrids of PLC/PCs are common now (e.g. WinPLC). This type of hardware tries to mix the two platforms using the strengths of both. So the CPU might be able to run Windows CE or Linux in a rack that can accept common I/O modules.

For some manufacturers the choice these days is coming down to buy a PLC or make your own. The benefits of PLCs have become so widely known that manufacturers looking to cut cost can engineer their own solutions and build them more cost effectively. An example of this is the Divelbiss "PLC on a Chip" with the accompanying EZ LADDER programming software.